Author: Russell J Kelsall

Posted on

FCA publishes policy statement and finalised guidance on ways consumer credit and mortgage firms should support customers in financial difficulty

Earlier today, on 10 April 2024, the UK Financial Conduct Authority published a press release and Policy Statement, PS24/2, setting out the new rules and guidance which will apply to consumer credit and mortgage firms to support customers in financial difficulity.

The FCA has also published updated finalised guidance, FG24/2, and a press release.

The changes made to both CONC and MCOB by PS24/2, and FG24/2, will come into force on 4 November 2024.

We’ve set out a summary in a one page infographic (if you click the infographic it should be larger):

If you want a PDF copy, please contact your usual contact at Walker Morris LLP.

Posted on

FCA publishes data on Mortgage Charter uptake

On 22 March 2024, the UK Financial Conduct Authority published data on firms who have signed up to the Government’s Mortgage Charter.

The key points are:

– There are 48 signatories to the mortgage charter (making up around 90% of the mortgage market).

– The data suggests at least 760,000 accounts benefitted from one or more of the options set out in the Charter.

– Around 90,543 mortgage accounts have temporarily reduced their monthly payments under the FCA new rules.

– Between July 2023 and January 2024, the monthly payments on around 123,000 accounts were reduced as people switched to temporarily paying interest-only or extended their mortgage term (making up around 1.4% of the regulated mortgage contracts). Only 103 term extensions were reversed.

– The data says 67 properties were repossessed within 12 months of missing the first payment. Firms say these were for customer-driven reasons.

– It is difficult to estimate the total number of borrowers who have taken up one or more of the options set out in the Charter.

– The FCA reminds firms that the options under the Charter form only part of the support. All borrowers can contact their lender and discussion their options (see, for example, the industry’s ‘Reach Out’ campaign. This support could include contract variations or appropriate forbearance measures.

Posted on

FCA publishes findings of multi-firm review into insurers’ valuations of vehicles

On 27 March 2024, the UK Financial Conduct Authority published its findings into its review of firms’ claims-handling processes for valuing vehicles which have been stolen or written-off (often called ‘total loss’ claims).

Some of the key points are:

– Firms must deal with total loss claims promptly and fairly and in line with their obligations under ICOBS 8.1 leading to firms “identifying a fair estimate” of a vehicle’s market value.

– valuation of vehicles:

* The FCA found some good practice including firms offering settlement values closely aligned to retail prices and the firms used the same guides for valuations as the Financial Ombudsman Service.

* The FCA found some areas for improvement including examples of firms offering values lower than available guide prices, firms making deductions based which could lead to unfair customer outcomes and making ‘initial offers’ which are not the firms’ best offers.

– communicating an initial offer:

* The FCA found good practices of initial offer communications clearly explaining the settlement offers and such offers giving customers an opportunity to give additional information relevant to valuation.

* The FCA found some areas for improvement including ensuring communications do not dissuade customers from challenging valuations.

– handling disputed valuations:

* The FCA found good practices of firms allowing customer to provide additional information relevant to valuation and, where a customer rejects a revaluation, most firms treated such challenges as a complaint.

* The FCA found some areas for improvement including not discouraging customers from disputing valuations and not having enough MI to show that a revaluation did not result in systematically different outcomes for customers.

– outsourcing: the FCA found several areas for improvement including: (a) having better oversight arrangements, (b) better managing conflicts of interest and (c) ensuring that outsourcing did not lead to systematically different customer outcomes.

– treatment of policies after a claim settlement:

* The FCA found some good practices including most firms giving customers the opportunity to substitute a vehicle on the policy for the rest of the term.

* The FCA found some areas for improvements including firms requiring customers to pay the remaining premium from the settlement rather than allowing customers to continue making monthly payments of the premium.

– management information and data collection: the FCA found areas for improvement including (a) collecting basic data on total loss claims, (b) monitoring the average deviation between vehicle valuations and guide prices and (c) demonstrating that appropriate MI was collected and analysed to ensure different approaches do not lead to systematically different customer outcomes.

Insurance firms, and third parties providing insured valuation services, will need to quickly digest the FCA’s findings and make changes (where relevant) with a clearly documented rationale for any steps taken by them. The FCA is likely to pick up all of these themes in any future engagement with such firms.

Posted on

Bank of England, FCA, PRA and PSR conduct review of Memorandum of Understanding for payment systems in the UK

On 28 March 2024, the UK Financial Conduct Authority published a statement about the joint-authority Memorandum of Understanding which is in place between the FCA, the Bank of England, the Prudential Regulation Authority and the Payment Systems Regulator.

The statement confirms those authorities have carried out their eighth review of the MoU in 2023.

The key points are the authorities:

– consider their co-operation is “working well”;

– continue to exchange “expertise, information and data related to regulated activities”;

– continue to “work together closely on issues of common regulatory interest and seek to avoid duplication in their requirements and engagement with industry”;

– have “identified areas for future co-operation and co-ordination, including revisions to the MoU regarding proposed stablecoin regulation, embedding the reforms from the Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 (FSMA 2023), as well as further enhancing the sharing of information and data”; and

– will continue “to work, as needed, with the Treasury in its preparation of a National Payments Vision”.

Firms will therefore need to be acutely aware of the overlap, and co-operation, between authorities throughout their engagement and interaction with those authorities.

Posted on

FCA publishes finalised guidance on financial promotions on social media

Earlier today, on 26 March 2024, the UK Financial Conduct Authority published a press release and finalised guidance on financial promotions on social media.

There’s much in the guidance but some headline points for now are:

– The FCA has repeated its guidance that it expects financial promotions to be standalone compliant. While promotions of complex financial products “might require additional supporting information or disclosure“, the “initial promotion needs to remain compliant in and of itself“.

– The requirement for prominence in the FCA’s handbooks is “media-neutral“. Firms should consider the existence guidance on prominence. Firms should ensure information which is required to be displayed prominently “is displayed without needing click-through or any other optional action to view it“.

– Social media may not always be appropriate to promote financial products.

– There are some examples of how an unregulated BNPL financial promotion could be published.

– Firms are reminded of the consumer duty and how it could apply to social media.

– There is a real focus on influencers (or finfluencers).

– There’s guidance for firms on what ‘in the course of a business‘ means. The FCA makes it clear that this includes any level of commerciality. There are also some examples in paragraphs 4.20 to 4.27.

Posted on

FCA publishes a portfolio letter to consumer lenders

On 20 March 2024, the UK Financial Conduct Authority published a portfolio letter to three portfolios in the consumer lending market: high-cost lending, ‘mainstream’ consumer credit lending and credit unions.

The FCA says it priorities to ensure markets function well are:

– reducing and stopping serious harm;

– setting and testing higher standards; and

– promoting competition and positive change.

For its promoting competition and positive change priority, the FCA has a focus on providing access to affordable credit. The FCA says firms should consider ways they can support customers (for example, using effective signposting) but not compromising standards. The FCA encourages firms to think about innovating and providing greater access to affordable credit.

For its reducing and preventing harm priority, the FCA says:

– firms must lend responsibility and sustainably: The FCA says it’s “more important than ever to ensure your firm makes sound affordability and credit-worthiness assessments”. Whilst the FCA has “seen some improvements, we remain concerned about sludge practices” (ie unreasonable barriers). Firms using artificial intelligence need to test its effectiveness. Re-lending most be done affordability, responsibility and sustainably.

– firms must ensure the price paid for a product or service is reasonable compared to the overall benefits: The FCA’s price and fair value requirements in consumer duty is a key development. The FCA acknowledges lending to certain cohorts can be greater and may lead to increased prices but firms should not “capitalise by increasing prices unfairly and offering products that do not provide fair value”. The fact that there is a price cap for high-cost short-term credit does not mean the cap provides fair value: it is a maximum rate.

– firms must support customers in financial difficulty: The FCA says “many firms were not considering or taking sufficient account of consumers’ individual needs or circumstances or providing appropriate tailored forbearance”. The FCA encourages firms to ensure it is acting in compliance with its rules and the Tailored Support Guidance (and new changes are likely to happen by the end of June 2024).

– firms must handle complaints and redress requirements effectively: The FCA says it remains “concerned” and expects “to see more widespread improvements in how firms handle complaints”. The FCA is currently processing a complaints multi-firm review involving a small number of high-cost lenders.

– firms must have appropriate systems and controls in place to mitigate risks of financial crime: The FCA acknowledges that the current market conditions increase the risk of illegal money lending and domestic financial abuse. Firms should improve their processes, procedures and practices.

– firms must have robust governance practices, ensuring effective oversight and risk management: The FCA says firms must have “robust governance practices guaranteeing effective oversight and rigorous risk management protocols to identify, monitor and manage operational risks”. The FCA says there are issues across the consumer lending market but failures are “particularly acute” in parts of the credit union and high-cost portfolios.

For the setting and testing high standards priority, the FCA reminds firms about the effect of the introduction of the consumer duty. The FCA says it is not “a once and done exercise”. The FCA also reminds firms of policy changes including the proposed reform of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, the introduction of product sales data returns and changes allowing credit unions to offer hire purchase, conditional sale and insurance distribution services.

Posted on

FCA joins with other regulators to warn firms about debt collection

On 18 March 2024, the UK Financial Conduct Authority published a news story calling on firms to improve debt collection practices. All of the regulators feel that this is particularly important given many consumers continue to feel cost of living pressures.

The news story also includes links to:

– a joint press release; and

– a copy of the joint letter dated 18 March 2024.

This joint letter follows on from a letter published on 28 June 2023 (see the press release and the joint letter dated 28 June 2023).

The latest joint letter makes the following points for financial services firms:

– firms should start from the position that customers in collections are highly likely to have characteristics of vulnerability and should follow FCA’s expectations under the consumer duty (including its finalised guidance) and its vulnerable customer guidance;

– the consumer duty strengthens existing requirements;

– there is foreseeable harm if a debt collection communication sent the customers are perceived to be intimidating or unsupportive (and communications should be tested)

– firms may want to encourage ‘warm’ handovers between frontline and specialist teams; and

– the FCA aims to publish its policy statement before June 2024 on its response to Consultation Paper 23/13.

The FCA reminds financial services firms (and this point should not come as any surprise) that debt collection rules and guidance apply to both debt collectors and to lenders taking steps to recover payments due under credit agreements or consumer hire agreements.

Posted on

FCA decides to investigate the use of personal guarantees given for certain small business lending

On 5 March 2024, the UK Financial Conduct Authority published a press release announcing it is investigating the use of personal guarantees given to lenders to support loans made to certain small businesses. The follows the Federation of Small Businesses making a ‘super-complaint’ to the FCA.

The FCA’s perimeter is, in fact, fairly limited for business lending. It only applies to such lending where (in broad terms):

– the borrower is an individual or a relevant recipient of credit (being a partnership of two or three persons not all of whom are incorporated, or an unincorporated body of persons which does not consist entirely of bodies corporate and is not a partnership); and

– the amount of credit is no more than £25,000.00.

The FCA will:

– collect data between April 2024 and June 2024 to understand when lenders entering into a regulated credit agreement are asking for guarantees;

– review samples of firms’ policies and procedures;

– work with the Financial Ombudsman Service to monitor the level of complaints; and

– consider whether lenders need further guidance in CONC.

The FCA has also published its response to the super complaint.

Posted on

Financial Conduct Authority decides to take action on certain motor finance commission complaints

🚨 So yesterday was an interesting (and busy) day for motor finance lenders and dealers. Firstly, the FCA decided to intervene into motor finance commission complaints. Secondly, two Ombudsman decisions were published on discretionary commission arrangements entered into before 28 January 2021.

🗞️ So what happened?

✍️ The FCA published a webpage about motor finance commission complaints and a press release too.

✋The FCA has paused the 8 week deadline for responding to motor finance complaints where (a) there was a discretionary commission model in place for an agreement before 28 January 2021 and (b) the complaint was made on or after 17 November. This pause lasts until 25 September 2024.

🤔 The lack of any consultation means there are many unanswered questions. For example, what happens to letters of claim? Is there any impact on litigation cases? And what steps should firms take to investigate paused complaints (the Ombudsman has already been in touch on that!).

🕵️ The FCA is using its powers under Section 166. This means some firms will have a skilled person looking into their practices. We know from our clients that meetings are already being booked in today and on Monday.

🪧 But what has the Ombudsman done?

The Financial Ombudsman Service has issued two detailed decisions from an Ombudsman upholding complaints (and one which was not upheld). They both conclude that discretionary commission models are unfair and the customer should effectively only pay the interest at the rate at which the dealer would receive no commission.

There’s much to say on this but some initial points:

(a) It hard to reconcile that guidance and a principle meant that firms should have done significantly more than CONC 4.5.3R required (either before or after the changes in 2021

(b) The approach bears very little resemblance to our experience of dealing with hundreds of similar claims before the Court.

(c) The proposal on redress takes no account of the complexity and reality of a customer’s decision to get a car on finance.

📋 So, what next?

Given it’s fashionable to do three point slogans then mine is: reflect on the developments, prepare for next steps (including, probably, more customer communications) and clearly decide and implement your strategy.