FCA tells firms to improve their treatment of struggling small business borrowers

On 12 July 2022, the UK Financial Conduct Authority published a press release telling firms to improve their treatment of struggling small business borrowers together with (a) its review into small and medium enterprise collections and recoveries and (b) a ‘Dear Chair’ letter to firms.

The FCA reviewed the practices of eleven banks. It found a number of issues including:

– lenders not treating small businesses fairly when trying to agree sustainable payment plans (for example, arranging clearly unaffordable payment plans);

– staff not having the right training to provide effective support to consumers and to make fair decisions;

– lenders not having clear policies to help staff identify and support vulnerable customers; and

– not having quality assurance and testing for their processes to ensure that they deliver fair results for consumers.

The FCA has given feedback to individual firms. It has also written to the chairs of all retail banks with small business customers. The FCA makes it clear that their ’Dear Chair’ letter is based on the existing principles, rules and guidance. It reminds firms that it will not wait for the introduction of the consumer duty in 2023 to take action where it finds evidence of customer detriment.

The ‘Dear Chair’ letter makes it clear that “all regulated firms offering lending to individuals and relevant recipients of credit (“RRCs”) should consider the findings and recommendations and where necessary, act on them“. The FCA expects “accountable Senior Manager(s) to proactively engage to achieve good practice when overseeing SME collections and recoveries“.

The FCA has set out some of its expectations in the ‘Dear Chair’ letter. These include:

– Where borrowers are treated as if they have a regulated credit agreement, either by requirement or voluntarily, firms should be able to demonstrate they are meeting these standards.

– Policies and procedures are clear with adequate information to support staff to make judgements when required.

– Systems and controls should be arranged to help with the delivery of fair customer outcomes.

– Firms should be able to accurately maintain records and be able to use such records to test whether they have delivered fair outcomes. Firms should also be able to produce customer records without gaps in a timely manner;

– Firms should be able to demonstrate forbearance and due consideration are being offered in accordance with CONC 7.3.4R (where it applies).

– Where CONC 7.2.1R applies, the firm must establish and implement clear, effective and appropriate policies and procedures for the fair and appropriate treatment of customers, who the firm understands, or reasonably suspects, to be vulnerable.

– The management of third parties should be subject to a suitable risk framework that helps ensure fair treatment of SMEs

– The FCA encourages all firms to carry out both quality assurance and customer outcomes testing for customer processes. This assurance should follow a holistic approach so that the customer’s overall outcomes are understood and these are assessed for fairness. There should be clear evidence that root cause analysis is effectively identifying opportunities to improve customer outcomes.

– Staff should receive suitable training that equips them to effectively support SME customers to receive fair outcomes during collections and recoveries.

– Senior management should receive effective MI that allows holistic oversight of SME customer treatment during collections and recoveries

– Senior managers responsible for collections and recoveries should have suitable levels of awareness and oversight of SME customer matters including treatment during collections and recoveries.

The FCA is expected to publish its review of its final findings into firms’ provision of appropriate support to borrowers in financial difficulty both during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, and next steps. This publication is currently expected on Q3 2022.

FCA consults on changes to CONC 7 following the introduction of the Bounce Back Loan Scheme

On 5 June 2020, the UK Financial Conduct Authority (the FCA) published a quarterly consultation, CP20/7, proposing to make changes to Chapter 7 of the Consumer Credit Sourcebook (CONC).

The proposed changes to CONC follow the introduction of the UK Government’s ‘Bounce Back Loan Scheme’ (or BBLS) which introduced a new category of exempt credit agreement in Article 60C(4A) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities) Order 2001 (the RAO) (for more, please see our earlier blog post). But the RAO did not exempt the collecting of debts due under such BBLS loans.

The draft instrument proposes to amend CONC so that:

– CONC 7.12 is extended so it applies to firms who would be consumer credit lending but for the changes made to the RAO for BBLS loans; and

– the expression ‘regulated credit agreement’ is expanded to include an exempt agreement under Article 60C(4A) of the RAO (but not in CONC 7.1.5G, CONC 7.6 and CONC 7.7.4G).

The deadline for responding to the consultation is 5 July 2020.

FCA writes to the Financial Ombudsman Service about the Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme and the Bounce Back Loan Scheme

On 4 May 2020, the UK Financial Conduct Authority’s Interim Chief Executive, Christopher Woolard, wrote to the Financial Ombudsman Service’s Chief Executive, Caroline Wayman, following the launch of both the Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme (CBILS) and the Bounce Back Loan Scheme (BBLS).

Mr Woolard’s letter sets out:

– entering into an agreement made under the BBLS is not a regulated activity because such agreements will be exempt credit agreements (but debt-collecting of those agreements will remain a regulated activity);

– there is no requirement to undertake a creditworthiness or affordability search before entering into an agreement under the BBLS;

– the unfair relationship provisions in Sections 140A to 140C of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 are expected to be dis-applied for agreements made under BBLS ; and

– the FCA’s expectations on creditworthiness assessments under the CBILS.

The FCA also updated its website on 4 May 2020 on the CBILS and BBLS.

Statutory Instrument to exempt Bounce Back Loan Scheme agreements from regulation published

On 1 May 2020, the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities) (Coronavirus) (Amendment) Order 2020 was published together with an explanatory memorandum.

The effect of this Order is to amend Article 60C of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities) Order 2001 (the RAO) to add a new exemption for credit agreements entered into under the Bounce Back Loan Scheme (but the exemption will not apply to debt-collecting under such agreements).

Interestingly, the explanatory memorandum says this Order is needed to “urgently remove loans made under BBLS from a highly prescriptive consumer credit regulatory regime which is currently inhibiting lenders from granting loans to small businesses”. It remains to be seen whether HM Treasury will have a similar view on the proposed revisions to the modifying agreement provisions.

FCA publishes a statement about creditworthiness provisions for regulated credit agreements made under the UK Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme and the new Bounce Back loan scheme

On 27 April 2020, the UK Financial Conduct Authority published a statement about creditworthiness on the UK Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme (often called ‘CBILS’) and the Bounce Back Loan scheme (often called ‘BBL’ or ‘BBLS’).

The FCA recognises “the need to make changes to the CBILS scheme immediately“.  The FCA says if firms comply with the relevant requirements of CBILS, then it does not expect them to comply with CONC 5.2A-34 where the lending involves a regulated credit agreement.  But firms must continue to comply with CONC 5.2A for all other regulated lending.

The FCA expects to make a similar statement when BBL is launched.